In a front page article in the International Express 17-23 August 2010 this question is raised because 77% of all new jobs in England go to foreigners.  Too many Brits prefer to survive on benefits.  Nearly eight out of ten people starting [...]]]> The big question in all Western Democracies is how to get people to work?

In a front page article in the International Express 17-23 August 2010 this question is raised because 77% of all new jobs in England go to foreigners.  Too many Brits prefer to survive on benefits.  Nearly eight out of ten people starting a new job in the past three months were born overseas, according to official statistics.

Far too many British families, the welfare system means it isn’t worth the trouble to work.  Losing benefits and paying taxes means that working for pounds 5.80 per hour at the minimum wage can be worth as little as 26p! (100 = 1 pound).

Of 188,000 extra people winning jobs in the 3 months to June; 145,000 were born overseas.  What is the position in Australia, we bring in 300,000 migrants a year and we are told the economy needs them, but how many Australian born workers are employed in the year?

In her policy speech Gillard endorsed hard work.  Is Gillard providing the moral platform for a much tougher Labor approach to welfare?  The Australian 18 Aug, 2010 pg. 12. Paul Kelly.

Perhaps not, both parties are ducking a debate on the workplace.  The Australian 17 August, pg 15.  The Leader.

 Abbott is scared stiff it could cost him the election and Gillard is afraid to upset the union.  Gillard claims that her policy is all about fairness.  “There is nothing fair about denying young people a couple of hours work after school because FWA prescribed longer minimum shifts.  There is nothing fair about costing casual staff weekend work by setting their  rates so high businesses cannot afford to open.  And there is nothing fair about re-regulating wages and conditions across the country.  What Labor never mentions about Work Choices is its flexibility helped cut unemployment to 4%”.

The miners do no t want to be taxed.  The big end of town wants the GST increased and taxes on business reduced.  They demand we keep up the migrant intake so that the unions and developers can make a fortune building cities for these immigrants.  They export out industry overseas and they do not want to educate our children to take the skilled jobs now going to immigrants.  Abbott is afraid of the unions and big business leaves him to fight alone.  Neither party is keen on making Australia a manufacturing nation.

Neither main party attacks the greens who support a return to the pre-industrial period with cottage industries powered by wind turbines manufactured in industrial Asia and Africa.

England is getting rid of her armed forces which she can no longer afford.  Perhaps we should do the the same and allow a militant China to take us over.

What you may be sure is that a vote for any of the parties will not do most of us any good.  We must start an alternative party for the next election.

No Western manufacturing company can survive in the global market place against products made by Western technology and cheap labour, [...]]]> If  Obama has anything to be proud of, it is his demand that the bankrupt car companies cut back the lavish entitlements of their workers and management before they were bailed out by the public purse.

No Western manufacturing company can survive in the global market place against products made by Western technology and cheap labour, available in Asia.

The answer is increasingly automated factories with minimum labour requirements.  In future the sustainable society will be the small society.

Education is the key to employment.  In the future there will be no place for more than a few unskilled workers and whoever supports a population of 9 billion or more for the planet would condemn the human race to eternal misery.

Polls have shown that most of us believe that Bigger isn’t better and Barry Cohen in his article in The Australian, 6th August, 2010, p.14 makes this point, explaining that Australia is 85% semi arid or desert and the business community conveniently says nothing about our latest 10 year drought or the need to build desalination plants.  That is the government’s problem and our cost.

Our greedy Big End of Town does not care what happens to Australia in the future as long as a massive immigration program fuels their bank balances.

France is full of unemployable immigrants brought in to man France’s now non-existent factories and these angry and destructive people are living off the French state and people.

Supporters of our massive immigration program in Australia try to silence dissent by calling those who oppose this indigestable invasion, selfish and economically illiterate.

These people claim that more people guarantee greater prosperity, absolute rubbish; the only group who will gain are  the developers amd certain unionists and who will pay for the cost of this expansion?  The rest of us.

Annabel Hepworth in her article “Business leaders say we need boat people”, The Australian, 6th August, 2010, p.21, gives the Big End of Town the chance to have their say on population.

Tony Shepherd, Group chairman of Transfield Services and Toll road operator ConnectEast, said the debate is ‘terrible’ and he was amazed the country was having it.  He admired boat people and said we are all fundamentally boat people.

Chris Lynch, chief executive of Toll road owner Transurban said, “Surely we’ve got to continue to grow or we start to decay”.

Baulderstone managing director, Rick Turchini said, “we are talking about restricting boat people and on the other hand we are paying baby bonuses.”

Alinta Energy chief executive, Ross Rolfe, a member of the board of Infrastructure Australia and former Queensland co-ordinator general wanted “the population and boat people debate to fade into the distance”.

Mr. Rolfe also said, “he wanted to see move from the opposition on infrastructure”.

All these people make a fat living from the migrant industry and the rest of us foot the bill.

These people are all dinosaurs, we do not want more people in the World we want less.  At the recent Pacific forum the Islanders said they wanted a better standard of living, and so do all the rest of the Third World.  Quite impossible with the present population explosion.  India alone produces an increase in population of 20 million a year and Africa and South America are just as bad.

Idiots from the Human Rights and other Left wing groups demand we give everything we have to make the world a better place to live in.  Their real desire is to destroy our civilization.  They praise China and India and get us to waste billions of dollars on a corrupt and primitive Africa.

We do not need the parasitic NGO’s.  Our future lies in the ‘sustainable’ society.

In an article by Steven Pearlstein “US companies put profits before jobs” The Guardian Weekly, 6.8.10 p.17, he tell us that 8 million jobs were eliminated in 2008 and 2009 in the US and have added a scant 600,000 since then.

Although the jobs haven’t returned the profits have and at dollars 1.2 trillion annually.

The most important US government initiative was to use it’s leverage on large auto companies to force them into painful changes they should have made years before.

The West needs a sustainable economy not hoards of immigrants, it needs high tech automatic factories manned by it’s own well educated and technically literate children.

In this perhaps Japan is showing the way “Japan’s resistance to change”, Time, Vol. 176 No. 5, 2010.

There is no future in this social experiment in breeding mixed bloods so popular with our leaders like Britain’s Blair, Brown  and Cameron, America’s Bush and Obama and Australia’s Fraser and Howard.

Big will be the death of our society.  Anyway if we do want to expand let us take Michael Sainsbury’s advice and employ Shen He Tang and his low cost Chinese hoards.  They will be quicker as well.

We caused the recession designed to last forever, we are the reason that we are out of work, we [...]]]> An exhausted Europe after WW2 allowed a rising socialist elite to educate our children to kill Nationalism and our industrial civilization and replace them with the caring society and the post industrial state.

We caused the recession designed to last forever, we are the reason that we are out of work, we are the reason that most things we buy are made in the Third World, we are the reason our elite and financial sector are back to making outrageous profits.

Why are we the reason?

We voted into power the governments of both Left and Capitalist Right that starting with Thatcher and Reagan gave us what we wanted.  Cheap imports and the removal of protection from our inefficient industries.

We did not realise that the Lima Agreement and Globalism gave Industry and Capital the perfect answer to militant unions and high wages.  The low wages and increasingly educated work force of China, India and the rest of the Third World.

Workers made redundant by the loss of our large manufacturing industry spurned the menial jobs offered by our service industries, but that did not matter, our clever elite and governments invented the immigrant industry which satisfied most of our requirements for cheap and compliant labour.  It did not matter if our schools produced social misfits only interested in making the World a better place to live in, but quite incapable of satisfying the needs of even the most undemanding occupation.  Migrants would fill these positions.  The bias of our schools and our universities against all but the environmental sciences did not matter, Indian and Chinese graduates would take over scientific research.

Our most militant unions would be kept happy building roads, houses, shopping malls and infra-structure for the migrant industry, 300,000 immigrants a year.

As an added bonus, the Big end of Town would be kept happy becoming rich at the expense of the rest of us.

A very large Chinese company wants to develop our mining industry in the Pilbara, they say that they will build any towns and infra-structure needed, as long as they can use cheap Chinese labour and why not?, we do not owe the unions and the Big end of Town anything, they will sell us to the highest bidder any way.

We have to face the fact that at the moment those of us with national feelings are in the minority.  Hanson at her best only received one million votes and most Right wing parties in Europe and England are doing well if they receive 15 – 25% of the vote.

Cameron P.M. and head of the Tory party is a Left-wing radical and our Turnbull is probably to the Left of Labor.

One thing is certain, the introduction of measures to overcome so-called man made global warming by Australia alone will mean the end of our society as we know it.  Back to Dad and Dave shacks, outside toilets, bicycles and water from the well.  If that occurs be realistic and consider migration outside the Anglo-Saxon sphere.

We do not have a party that represents us and even the Tory party in England has been taken over by socialism.  Without a party how can we dignify Labor or Liberal with our valid vote?  Any party that tries to represent us is killed by the press, we do not have a democratic voice in parliament, socialism, however good in theory, is destroying the West.

One of the major decisions to be made in the near [...]]]> How does our democracy work?  What input do we have on the decisions made in our name by our elected representatives?  Globalism, multiculturalism and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would suggest we have little input in major decisions that affect our way of life.

One of the major decisions to be made in the near future is our immigration policy and the size of our future population.

As has been stated previously migration is of no advantage to Australia’s present population.  Mass migration will destroy our life style.  Furthermore a survey held from December 2009 to February 2010 and administered by The Australian Social Science Data Archives at the Australian National University which drew on a random sample of 3142 votes, found 69% of voters believe that Australia does not need more people, 31% believe it does.  Women 75% are more likely to want a stable population than men 62%.  Voters who wanted growth tended to give economic reasons.  Voters who wanted stablility emphasised the need to train our own skilled workers and the need to protect the environment. (Swinburne Issue 10, July 2010, Fast Facts).

On the other hand The Australian newspaper has had a mass of articles since Gillard put forward her Small Australia policy, supporting a big Australia, written by developers who have much to gain from the continued immigrant industry

I have listed below some of the comments:

1. Europe shows the alternative to growth is decline.  A shrinking population and inflated expectations are a damaging mix.  Oliver Mark Hartwich, The Australian, 23.7.10. p.12

2.The Australian, 22.7.10. P1. Reject little Australia, P.M. advisers…..Professor McDonald says, “as we saw in the Hanson era, you don’t want to go down the track of bringing out the worst in Australians”.   “Migrants are being used as a scapegoat for the failure of government planning” he said.          Greg Sheridan p.7 says Julia Gillard is a national disgrace on population policy and she may do more harm to our long term prospects by this one foolish frolic (population policy) than any recent national leader.             Michael Stutchbury, p.7 The P.M.’s vow to ‘slow down’ on populating our cities ia a con on voters that we can continue to prosper from a stronger economy without footing the bill for more migrants.

3. Natasha Bita, p.4.  Households are paying at least 10 times more for energy guzzling desalination plants than dam water.           Jodie Minus, p.4, Employer preyed on Indians.  Indian students unfamiliar with Australia’s employment legislation allegedly paid up to dollars 3500 each to gain jobs as cleaners and burger-flippers at a Sydney Hungry Jacks franchise.

4. Annabel Hepworth, Richard Gluyas,  Business opposes migrant cuts. P.7 Prominent business leaders have warned that policies to slow population growth will damage the economy, allow governments to avoid tackling chronic infrastructure neglect in major cities and stoke inflationary wage pressures.. (The Migrant industry)           Toll Holdings chief executive Paul Little said a “fairly significant percentage of its employees in Australia came from elsewhere.         Business leaders said Japan’s economic growth was impeded by a static ageing population.           Westfarmers director Charles Macek said it was “untenable” for a country as large as Australia with it’s rich endowment of resources, to have a small population, not much larger than a very large global city.        Eileen Doyle a non-executive director of One-Steel and former chairman of Port Waratah Coal services, said infrastructure was a major  issue (and we must pay for it of course).

5. Drew Warne Smith p.6. Premiers support a population growth they can keep up with.           Labor premiers past and present have welcomed Julia Gillard’s call to stem the swelling population in and around the mainland capitals in a bid to protect Australia’s ‘way of life’.              Former NSW premier Bob Carr told the Australian the nation’s intake of migrants should be culled as it would be impossible to fund the infrastructure needed to support them – and equally futile to try to coax immigrants away from crowded cities when others shared their language and culture.

Well these are some of the articles in the Australian recently.  The big end of town wants to shaft us in it’s pursuit of it’s own gain and we will pay the bills without gaining employment.   We have little to gain and plenty to lose from continued mass migration only the big end of town prospers.  They have the money but we have the votes.

If democracy means anything we can stop this feral immigrant industry in it’s tracks.

In the 19th Century Jardine Matheson, the great English trading company in Canton and Hong Kong, was required by the Chinese government to pay for all Chinese trade goods in [...]]]> In my experience of China, two trade missions in the 1960′s, no deal is a good deal unless it is a win win result for them.

In the 19th Century Jardine Matheson, the great English trading company in Canton and Hong Kong, was required by the Chinese government to pay for all Chinese trade goods in silver, in return they only bought small amounts of trade goods from England.

This trade inbalance was an unacceptable situation for Jardines and their ruthless answer was to supply the Chinese market with opium, bypassing the Chinese government and either by barter or Chinese currency overcoming the inbalance.

The result was the Opium War.

Since the policy of globalisation was introduced by Europe and and America’s wealthy elite and the Lima Agreement, China’s cheap labour pool has been used to make China the World’s manufacturing centre for cheap goods.  Cheap labour is not the only advantage China has.  She has been given Western Technology for free and we have built Western factories with our capital and China takes little in return except for our resources.  Just another trade inbalance to China’s advantage except she does not want to pay market prices for our resources.-

In an article “We must play China card right”, by Michael Sainsbury, The Australian, 26.7.10, p.26, China’s future intentions are plain and also the support they are getting from Sainsbury (The Australian China correspondent, and also the Australian China Business Council, (ACBC))

At a meeting between the ACBC and Shen He Tang of China Metallurgical Group Corporation (MCC), which has built most of the latest mills in China………  Shen’s latest project in Western Australia was discussed, the problem is he wants to build it cheaply and quickly, something he can only do with IMPORTED CHINESE LABOUR.  Furthermore to prove the capability of his firm as an infrastructure builder he offered to build a city in the Pilbara that could house 400,000 – 500,000 people, (with more Chinese labour no doubt).

Labour is the key issue for us he told ACBC.  He also said, “The facilities in Australia’s mining areas are often inadequate.  We could build a town for 300,000 – 500,000 people with proper facilities” and he indicated this would help mining companies better exploit the vast resources of the region and add to Australia’s wealth.

At the moment Australians do not want to discuss importing cheap Chinese labourers.  But Shen says without cheaper Chinese labour, including it’s huge base of skilled engineers, it’s simply not possible to build such projects.

“But without such projects Australia misses out badly on needed infrastructure and projects will go to more accommodating countries, for example China’s No. 3 steelmaker”, Wuhan steel is building a mill in Brazil.”  (This is an obvious threat.)

The article continues “The MCC dilemma underscores the problems with Australia and China’s relationship, one that is heavily based on trade right now, but is rapidly become more complex as our two economies increasingly intertwine.”

China is keen to invest in our major projects but protects it’s own key projects, Maurice Newman says, “As Australia’s traditional providers of capital  -  U.S., Britain and even Japan face a prolonged economic slowdown – China is our main option for imported desperately needed capital.”

“In terms of Chinese investment in Australia, the mooted MCC steel mill model could be extended to other sorely needed infrastructure, such as ports, roads and other facilities using a system of bonds or eventually an equity sale.”

Senior Chinese officials expressed their disquiet over original mining tax.

The most revealing comment in this comment in this article was made by Paul Glasson, ACBC China chief who said “There has been a failure at government level to address the relationship with China at a Holistic level”.

A belief that Glasson shares with many others who do business with China.

Holistic has shades of meaning but here they would seem to be suggesting we get Chinese labour and companies to take over the development of Australia with eventual conquest while our overpriced unionists sit on their arses and drink beer.

Well at least the rest of could afford to buy houses and get the plumbing and other repairs done.

Europe was nearly destroyed after WW2 when the destruction of it’s cities and horrific loss of civilian life brought a reaction to war and our reliance on industry.  The so-called post-industrial revolution promoted by Left wing zealots in the socialist parties and in the universities, who [...]]]> China’s Labour edge is shrinking, Newsweek, 12th July 2010, p.60.

Europe was nearly destroyed after WW2 when the destruction of it’s cities and horrific loss of civilian life brought a reaction to war and our reliance on industry.  The so-called post-industrial revolution promoted by Left wing zealots in the socialist parties and in the universities, who took over the education systems in white communities and sold their particular brand of nihilism to the impressionable young, became the ruling class.

Without question the socialist primacy after WW2 in government, education and intellectual (thought) has brought our civilisation nearly to it’s knees.

Our civilisation is based on industry the transference of that to the Third World, and the adoption of man made global warming with all it’s costly gimmicks, will drive up our cost of living to such a level that only inner-city elite and the building trades will escape the extremes of poverty.

Our standard of living will fall to the level of our most primitive immigrant.

At last it would seem that our reliance on financial services and the green technology revolution, still mainly a hope for the future, countries including the US, the UK, France and Germany are taking a second look at old-fashioned manufacturing as an engine of job creation.

“A recent US Council on Competitiveness survey recently ranked the US quite high – fourth behind China, India and South Korea – on it’s list of most competitive manufacturing nations.    One reason was that talent edged out cost of labour as the key factor in determining competitiveness.” How is the result explained?  More educated workers are more productive workers another is that intellectual property is a key advantage for US manufacturers and must be protected.  Well first of all it takes almost 3 years at the moment for the Patent and Trade-mark Office to process a patent application.  The goal is 12 months.

The damage Left wing teachers do promoting equality of outcome in our schools is obvious.

Education must meet the needs of our society not some cock-eyed idea of making all people equal.  The best of our students must be encouraged to excel and must receive free university education.  Students who prefer to work in trades must have an education tailored to their needs and employers must train their quota of apprentices and all workers have to be accommodated.  Immigration should cease to be a source of workers.

As our standard of living falls because we follow the new religion of man made global warming: we must attack the purveyers of policies such as the World movement of people, the export of our wealth to the Third World.

When the Liberal, Greens and Labor parties have reduced our standard of living to that of the Third World you will get the message, that all our leaders want is to take the planet back to the dark ages for all but the elite and a few unionists.

He says that the offshore population explosion during the next 40 years [...]]]> In his article “Empty Country a lure for the masses” by Colin Fraser, The Weekend Australian, 10-11 July, 2010, p.5., Fraser unlike David Uren, 12 July, The Australian, p.21, goes some way to explain the danger Australia faces from the population explosion in Asia.

He says that the offshore population explosion during the next 40 years may well decide who will own our country in the centuries to come.

While Australia’s population may increase to 36 million in 40 years “seven or eight overcrowded countries to our North will increase their total numbers by some 1.25 billion”.

According to the article “Coincidentally, one of the US’s most respected research organisation  – for the study of cycles, has identified the start of a 500 year geopolitical cycle, it says it’s result will be a huge and permanent transfer of relative wealth and power from West to East.”

He failed to say that it all started when our white ant do-gooders after WW2 transferred by the Lima Agreement our technology to the Third World followed by our factories and capital under Globalisation.

We must expect aggression from the North and his pious hope that Australian could become another Switzerland is wishful thinking.

Switzerland has nothing of value.  We on the other hand have great wealth in our resources as well as the Asians have the flawed view that our country has great unpopulated fertile pastures.

Fraser says, “Australians must accept quickly that we cannot refuse to share our good fortune, nor set our own comfortable pace”.  He is right of course.  We must explore and mine our parks and increase our coal production and export it.  The World is no longer ours and our values will no longer be current.

Time for us is short.  The Chinese and Japanese are already buying up our firms and within two years or so will demand that they can replace our greedy unionists with their own labour.

China is the dominant power in Asia and, as the USA is overrun by Latinos, she will not care to protect us.  When the Chinese nuclear submarine fleet prowls our coast and pays us goodwill visits, we will get the message and allow in millions of Chinese migrants.  Democracy will be a thing of the past and all our bleeding hearts will end up trying to survive in Asian slums.

Russia is the only country xenophobic enough to resist and repel Asia and Africa’s billions.  If our race is to survive she is our only hope.

There have been many empires as civilised as ours in the past and they all lie in ruins.

Asians and Africans have the gene of chaos in their make up, they will not inherit our civilisation.  Over population in the World would in any case have made that impossible.  There will never be enough food and water for all.  As the Muslims in Europe and the Latinos in America have shown, they can only live off us;  Not take over from us our complex civilisation.

Time is short for us, our present numbers of approved migrants is 297,000 net a year.  That is not enough to satisfy China and possibly India.  China is the more aggressive of the two countries and only the American Pacific Fleet stops her demanding that we let in larger numbers of Chinese workers.  Obama shows the future for America.  He is trying to legalise all illegal immigrants in America.  If that occurs he will open the border with Mexico.

The new inheritors of America will have little interest in Australia and we will be thrown to the dogs.

Our only hope is to arm ourselves with nuclear weapons and submarines and be prepared to use them.  Something I cannot see happening.  The only alternative is to go to Russia.  She has some of the finest agricultural land on the planet, much of it unused and vast stores of resources.  If we do not populate her Asia will.

The matter is too important for us to remain silent.  Have your say on what our future should be.  Say it now before China rules us and you have to shut up or get a bullet in the back of your head.

David Uren, economics correspondent, say in his article,” Population surge linked to jobs growth”, The Australian, 12th July 2010, p.21, that “if the new Prime Minister, Julia [...]]]> The big end of town is becoming worried that both Labor (unions) and Liberal (capitalists) are afraid that Howard’s 300,000 migrant scheme is on the nose with the electorate.

David Uren, economics correspondent, say in his article,” Population surge linked to jobs growth”, The Australian, 12th July 2010, p.21, that “if the new Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, really wants to slow population growth she will need to put the brakes on the economy first” is wrong, the economy is the migrants without them we do not have an economy.

Leading ANU demographer Peter McDonald is out of date when he uses data from the 1890′s, 1930′s, mid 1970′s and mid 1990 to assert that migration falls when there is a slump and rises in boom times.

Europe is in a depression and Third World migrants continue to flood in.

The USA is in a slump and there is no let up in the flow of Latinos.

The population explosion in Africa, Asia and South America will drive billions of Third World people to migrate.

As I have said before and has been proved, building houses, shopping malls, roads, infrastructure for the flood of migrants may keep the building industry and keep it’s union members happy but spending, what we earn from selling our non-renewable resources to China, on building satellite cities in Warigal, Ballarat, Bendigo and Geelong with good transport to Melbourne is a waste.

Melbourne has, like all Australian cities, a falling industrial base and cities without industries should only be small regional centres for an agricultural economy.

France allowed in large numbers of North Africans to man her industries with cheap labour.  The big end of town sent her industries to China and now she has millions of unemployable Africans tearing the place apart.  Do we want that for Australia.

Uren avoids the real issue; By 2050 Asia will have about 1.5 billion extra people, Africa over 2 billlion.

China needs a reasonably safe resource supplier and Asia, India and Africa a haven for their overflowing billions and Australia will be their target.

They will fight over us.

If we build a nuclear arsenal and fleet we might keep them out but why fight for the big end of town with the sort of equipment the Greens, small l liberals and Left wing Labor give our troops.

If you do not wish to live under an Asian tyranny ‘you’ had better migrate.