Globalism?

Globalism and the secret governments in our flawed democracies.

admin — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:08:01 +0000

The special circumstances of the post WW2 period, when Britain was on it’s knees financially, gave a chance for progressive ideas (liberal Left) to be taken up by Britain’s governing elite even though elections showed that the liberal-Left tended to be unpopular with voters.

In his article “In every area of public life, the Left is losing the argument” Peter Oborne, The Telegraph, 11-17.1.12, names the elite as “dominating the higher reaches of the Universities, education, the public service bureaucrats, local government, Whitehall, the media (and in particular the B.B.C.), the churches, and the police”.

Germanys attack on Russia made communism respectable in England for a period and Russia’s worker state was lauded by the English elite such as George Bernard Shaw and the editor of the Times who visited Russia during the period of Stalin’s worst atrocities and saw nothing wrong.

The Start of Britain’s decay.

After the war this liberal Left-elite saw their chance to undermine the British state and starting with the schools and Universities fed their ideas to returned service-men who missed their further education because of the war. This elite “undermined institutions of the British state, said that state spending was automatically virtuous, that traditions should be destroyed, that the European federal idea was benign” (still current) “that the British monarchy was out dated and wrong, that mass immigration was a boon and that any criticism of the welfare state should be dismissed.”

“So rampant and all pervasive was the influence of this liberal Left-elite that, by the end, almost every meaningful action taken by the democratically elected John Major government could be sabotaged or blocked outright through the Civil Service, the B.B.C. and the Universities”.

America leads the way to our destruction.

America’s liberal Lefts’ ideas appealed to Wall Street in it’s hunt for cheap labour for it’s industries.

After the war the ideas of the liberal Left were universal in Western society.

We must atone for our Empires and mistreatment of the third world. They must no longer only supply our factories with raw materials, (like Australia now), we must help them develop their industries by allowing then to use our patents for free, help them set up new industries by finance and know-how. By making them suppliers of our every day wants at the expense of our own factories.

What a chance for Western industry and Western financial institutions. The Upper Class no longer need their working classes or middle class for that matter.

What ever Dick Smith says Australian pensioners and most of the working class cannot afford Australian made goods. Crushed between the upper class and the unions we cannot survive.

What drives the liberal Left.

Besides homosexuality the other British diseases are, altruism, the European dream with it’s emphasis on collective responsibility and global conscientiousness and our over-bearing arrogance inherited from the colonial era. That makes them now believe that morally they have a divine right to rule the World. As somebody once said, God is an Englishman.

These elite have put in place various organisations to control us. The NGO’s such as the human rights lobby, civil rights, world courts, our courts which are armed with human rights legislation, and a bill of rights and we poor fools say nothing.

Our Democracy is finished if we do not get rid of this elite and their organisations.

The West has lost it’s old drive to explore, invent and conquer or even defend ourselves. Britain is broke but Cameron still wants to give more aid to Africa.

Britain is becoming a third world society and the churches tell them that is their penace for inventing the industrial revolution.

Australia always follows Britain’s lead in politics, but is perhaps more radical. The state schools system in many cases show strong left wing bias and a recent incident was reported in The Australian, 27.1.12, p3., “Syllabus overhaul reignites race row”., “The Australian Curriculum Assessment Reporting Authority this week published its revised national history curriculum, after a early draft was attacked by the Greens and the National Sorry day committee for failing to make any explicit reference to the Stolen Generation until year 10.

Schools Minister, Peter Garrett – declared the original draft achieved the right balance signed off on the changes to the curriculum.”

“The changes will mean National Sorry Day held on May 26 is a significant day taught to year 3 students, and Mr. Rudd’s apology in 2008 will become part of the curriculum and year 6 students will learn about the Stolen Generation”.

About half of the electorate have no time for socialism so why should a small group of greens and a minority socialist government decide what all Australian students should learn.

Sydney magistrate Pat O’Shane has shown for some time how racially biased some of our courts are only in their case, the bias is against the White Race.

Henry Ergas, The Australian, 30.1.12, p12, “Enforcing one rule of law for all” points out how eager the police and judiciary were to prosecute large numbers of law-breakers at Cronulla whereas those at the tent embassy were not.

Our nation is splitting. The Gillard government is unquestionably pro union as shown by the amount of road work being carried out and the large payment of public money to the car industry, but we cannot afford to buy Australian made goods.

To survive in the face of the Asian attack on our markets; wages must collapse and the entry into our markets of goods made to patents pirated from us by Asian companies must be stopped.

The proposed Gillard white paper on Australia’s relations with Asia announced less that 3 months ago will determine our relations with Asia and in particular with China in future. (See the Weekend Australian Financial Review, 28.12.11) These elite will make us part of China before we know it if we do not stop them.

America gave it’s industry to China read “U.S. investment in China worsens trade deficit, Economic Policy Institute.” (Aust. Fin. Rev, 28.12.11)

Will our elite go one better and give Australian to China?

Globalism! Do we really need the lower classes and the old?

admin — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:02:12 +0000

World over population is not a subject that is discussed in polite society. The Roman Church does not care as long as they are Catholic, The Church of England believes that having children is a human right, black Africans just love sex and believe that the more you have the stronger you are.

In Islamic countries there is nothing else to do and in India and China children are old age insurance.

In the West things are different. Women in Northern Europe think that having children is a bore and interrupts their enjoyment of life. In Southern Europe even the hot Latins are beginning to cool off.

But what do the 1% of our society who own most of our assets and rule us say?

Malcolm Turnbull in his lecture * gives us some inkling of their thoughts, and what is obvious is that we are no longer a cohesive nation or indeed race. With greater education came destruction. After the war white intellectuals laid the causes of war at the feet of Nationalism and set about to destroy that social cement. They succeeded, but failed to sell most of us their new altruistic Internationalism.

Turnbull and his ilk in high office are still trying to sell this crap. In his lecture Turnbull eulogises the rise of Asia and China.

Particular phrases are worth rebutting; 1) There has never been a country as big as China that has grown so fast; 2) Americans are still struggling to come to grips with the rise of China; 3) Every technological advance reduces the demand for labour; 4) Global prices for manufacturers has fallen, a consequence of production scale and efficiency in Asia; 5) Perhaps most important of all, Governments can invest in the education, the science and the research that will enable us to remain competitive in a converged world where the developed societies can no longer assume they have the advantage in technology and knowledge.

It is not difficult to destroy Turnbull’s assertions. China’s rise to super power status is easy to explain. The monied classes in the U.S., Europe and the developed world are sick and tired on the constant wage demands of their lower classes, and the answer was simple as explained in the Briefing paper, “U.S. investment in China worsens trade deficit. U.S. firms build Export oriented production base in China’s low-wage low labor-protection economy and European firms soon followed.” Skilled labour can be bought anywhere in the world and so can soldiers to put unions in their place.

Like the rest of the West Australia is no longer a nation with common interests. Our shops are full of Chinese goods and Asian food. We cannot afford Australian prices fed by exorbitant wage demands. (If you don’t believe the shops being full of overseas goods check in KMart, BigW, Target and even Ikea, it is not only the tins being made in China so is the food in the tin, check it out, I did, I would hazard a guess and say these stores would be over 90% full of Asian goods, if I am wrong I apologize, ED.)

Multinationals want to be free of taxes and responsibilities. They do not want to be part of nations.

Socialism has no answer to the fall of our civilisation or the rapacious unionists. For rich capitalists the answer is simple, abandon the West.

The last comment is beyond belief.

Since the 1940′s we have given our technology and patents for free to the third world and he still expects us to do that. In my opinion giving trade and other secrets to the third world should be a capital crime enforced at all levels of society. Our press keeps on lauding the riots of the Arab Spring and in Russia but say nothing when it comes to Europe, America and the rest of the Western developed world.

All that people of the world want are jobs and a decent standard of living but will they work as hard as the Chinese under the same conditions?

Turnbull and his crew forget one thing. They need cashed up customers.

As far as the old are concerned the medical profession have got it wrong. Life span is less important than an easy death and a reasonable quality of life.

* Dunlop Lecture, November,2011.

Globalism and the anti Wall Street movement.

admin — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:47:12 +0000

An example of the all talk and no do that is destroying the West.

The white middle class in Europe and America are protesting against the affluence of the corporate sector and their own lack of success and employment. I have no sympathy for them. They initiated greenpeace, the wilderness society, human rights causes, foreign aid, the Lima Agreement and the transference of our industries to the third world. They promoted the post industrial society where every one would have a degree and an assured income without having to create wealth, but it failed. Ours is an industrial civilisation and only industry gives us an elevated standard of living, without it we are only entitled to be part of the third world, so get used to it when our governments reduce us to that level. The wealthy can always take their money elsewhere, which they have.

Even England’s Left wing Bible, The Guardian, has to admit that another 47 billion pounds in cuts are needed. Incomes will be lower in 2015 than 2002 and more than 700,000 jobs will be cut in the public sector.

Most importantly the article “Don’t keep calm and carry on”, (The Guardian Weekly, 9-15.12.11) says “This is a crisis to which socialism, certainly as practised over the past 100 years, is no plausible answer” But equally free market capitalism has laid Britain low.

The answer? Get rid of Globalism and compete for world trade using all means possible.

Globalism; Will the E.U. recover from the state debt crisis?

admin — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:22:56 +0000

Angela Merkel thinks it could take years, she proposes a tighter budget policing, which would cut imports but how does Europe become wealthy again?, only by manufacturing. That was the answer in the 1930′s and in 1947. United Europe?, what language? (The Australian, 16-12-11, p.9).

Globalism – Europe’s Post Industrial Society is destroying Western Civilisation.

admin — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 06:39:58 +0000

Living beyond your means is not uncommon in our society, it is a bad enough trait in the individual and catastrophic in a Nation. Peter Mendelson, Blair’s chief advisor, said Britain could not continue to rely on the financial sector (the city) to finance a negative trade balance and I believe Soros told a member of the government “You have nothing to sell”.

That is not only true of Britain but also most of Europe except Norway and industrial Germany and the Netherlands.

The Socialists tell us it does not matter if the government overspends and the church’s, human rights, NGO’s and the evil libertarians, tell us that everybody on the planet is entitled to a reasonable standard of living. RUBBISH.

In 1947 Europe was in ruins, England had an outdated industry committed to war production, only U.S. industry had escaped intact and the U.S. wanted U.S. dollars or gold for anything they sold.

The threat of communism forced America to come up with the Marshall plan to finance Europe’s dollar shortage, but the U.S. was still afraid of British competition and Britain had to agree to convertable currency, and pay all her debts in dollars. (1) p. 393.

In 1945 the U.S. was the World’s greatest supplier both of manufactured and capital goods and Britain was the leading debtor country. She owed more than 3,000 million pounds to wartime creditors and the prospect of a balance of payments deficit of 1,250 million pounds between 1945 – 1950. (1) p. 392.

At the start of WW2 (1939) the U.K. imported 20 million tons of foodstuffs per year including more than 50% of it’s meat, 70% of it’s cheese and sugar, nearly 80% of fruits and about 70% cereals and fats. (2).

After the war Britain could not afford to import food at the pre war level and rationing continued of many items till 1954.

What really destroyed Britain was the policy of the post industrial society, promoted by the greens, socialists, the church’s, human rights groups and last by the global warming fanatics.

To assist the third world develop Europe and America transferred much of their industry and patents overseas. Britain’s position was made worse because the U.S. insisted that a credit of $3,750 million was given on condition that Britain made sterling convertible for current transactions into any currency from 15 July 1947. (1) p. 393. The U.S. is some ally, why is Britain still friends with her?

Rationing of some goods continued until 1954 and Britain never recovered her trading position, multi-lateralism and the elimination to Trade Barriers insisted on by the U.S. saw to that. England and the E.U. are now living beyond their means, financially England and Europe are back to 1947 but this time the U.S. cannot help. The choice most of Europe and England have is stark, accept a third world standard of living and an overwhelming influx of Africans desperate for land or join the Russian block, which has all the resources needed to Europe to start manufacturing again and become self-sufficient.

The U.S. has always been an unreliable ally, after WW2 she abandoned the whole of Eastern Europe to communist Russia. Later she got out of Vietnam, Iraq and now Afghanistan. When the going gets tough will she abandon Europe to Africa and the Middle East and Australia and New Zealand to China?

America has still many good men, but her leadership like that of Europe and England stinks. Our society is riddled with people who hate our civilisation, the greens, communists, extreme socialists, human rights groups, anti-whites and church-going people who all think we owe the third world a living even if it destroys our civilisation.

American post war policies, as revealed at Bretton Woods, destroyed the British Empire and other European empires after WW2 and England without her Empire is a second rank power.

She owes the U.S. nothing and her future lies with Europe not America.

When Australia’s socialist governments talk about our future being in Asia do they really intend to make us an Asian dependency.

The average citizen in Western countries does not seem to believe that their governments cannot fix all problems to their satisfaction, but when the Guardian Weekly prints an article from the Observer that says, “This is a crisis to which Socialism, certainly as practised over the past 100 years, is no plausible answer. But equally nobody can dare agree that the solution is to press ahead with yet more of the free-market capitalism that has laid Britain and the West so low”. (3)

The article fails to say globalisation has been a catastrophic failure as far as the Western nations are concerned.

It may feel good to give a third world beggar your families’ food, but what will you say to your family when they are starving – go to church and feel good!!!!!!

1. The Sterling Crisis of 1947 and the British Response to the Marshall Plan, by C C S Newton. http;//www.jstor.org

2. Rationing in the United Kingdom, from Wikipedia.

3. The Guardian Weekly, 9.12.11, p.10, Don’t keep calm and carry on

Globalism and Julia’s right hand man?

admin — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:43:16 +0000

Julia gets a 30% rise is that for the man on her coat tails?

Globalism – Even migrants age.

admin — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:29:42 +0000

Our inner city elite, as usual, fails to see the demographic challenge of world over-population. Alexander Downer, foreign affairs minister in the Howard government, in his article in the Advertiser, 7.11.11, “A real issue is the need for skilled labour in a rapidly ageing population”, claims that “Globally, population growth is expected to come to an end in about 2050 or 2060″ cannot be substanciated. Migrant birth rates of third world people are not falling in Britain and there is no reason why they should. Birth rates have fallen in some countries of the Middle East and India but it is still well above replacement numbers. How long China can maintain a one child policy is also in doubt.

Downer admits that there is a shortage of potable water and food but claims that these can be overcome, but for how long?

If the screaming fanatics of the global warning lobby are to be believed we will all fry if we do not cut industrial out-put. So why do we need skilled migrants? America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand have all adopted POST INDUSTRIAL POLICIES so why the need for skilled labour? We do not manufacture.

Downer suggests that we obtain skilled migrants from “South Asia-India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and so on “. As he says “migrants from the third world who crave higher living standards”..

These migrants will not come to Australia to help finance an ageing white population too lazy to produce children to help finance their old age.

Why skilled migrants?, the mines use few workers, we are sending abroad the few factories we have and few of these migrants want to work on our farms under conditions our own people will not stand.

The real reason that Downer and his ilk want a flood of migrants is to keep the service and housing industries going and to keep the inner city elite happy.

China’s one child policy has shown the world the way to control World population. Mass immigration, as most experts admit, is not the answer, population numbers will continue to explode and to age and Downer’s answer only puts off the evil day to the following generation.

As for Australia the answer is let China provide the migrants. They will make Australia a manufacturing nation. Force our rapacious citizens to earn their living and stop our population expanding with the third world migrants we do not need.

Globalism and the misleading cult of ‘internationalism’ is destroying the West.

admin — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:36:11 +0000

The Western press, the media, the churchs’ and our ruling class, the so-called ‘inner city elite’, all claim to be international in outlook.

In war our press reports propaganda from both sides but in fact favours left wing causes, third world insurgents and unrestricted immigration from the third world to the West.

Even our churchs’ led by the Church of England support sharia law in England and “accomodation” of Muslim thought on many subjects. Yet Jihad watch: Church of England U.K. 28th May 2008, says the U.K. will be an “Islamic nation” by 2038. As the article says England’s politically correct liberals encourage Muslim women only sessions in municipal swimming baths and in Dewsbury Hospital staff waste time 5 times a day by turning beds to face Mecca.

Christianity is now a third world religion. The Christianity that the third world brings to the West is unlike anything seen before – just as alien as Islam. (The rise of anti-Western Christianity, The Brussels Journal).

In Australia things are little better, in the Sydney Cronulla riots the police and many local shop keepers sided with the Muslim louts harassing local white couples. Our media supports mass immigration from non-European third world countries and our democracy is a farce when multi-racialism is forced upon us without a debate or referendum.

In my view the greatest betrayal of all that amounts to treason is the gift of our industrial secrets and our industries to the third world by all hues of our political spectrum, again without a referendum.

As the carbon tax shows our politicians do not represent us, they impose upon us minority views of their radical supporters.

The Liberals are no better, when Labor wanted to bring in laws to curb High Court interference in migration, they did not support the bills.

David Cameron shows the duplicity of modern politicians. He is the new ‘Liberal’ brand of Tory.

In his speech to the World Economic Forum, Davos 28.1.11, he said Europe was living beyond it’s means, most countries needed continual large loans to survive and Europe must start to manufacture again. In the next minute he supports unrestricted investment by China in European industry and research firms and said nothing about union wage demands that cripple exports.

Thatcher attempted to control union wages by allowing British industry and technology to be sold to China and supported the import of cheap labour into Britain but that approach does not work. Wages are still high, workers are indolent and nothing less than a crash of the 1930′s proportion will convince the work force that no government can give them the life style that they demand.

Unfortunately Labour and the Tories will bring England to it’s knees as it becomes overpopulated with third world people used to the subsistence living that will be forced on Britain and Europe.

Australia and New Zealand will be no better. Making a living out of migrant housing without a firm industrial base and strong export base will leave most workers in third world jobs competing with third world people, unions or no unions, and praying 5 times a day to Mecca as well?

Globalism – Two fracticidal wars have brought Western civilisation to it’s knees.

admin — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 08:26:19 +0000

The decay of Western civilisation continues. Two catastrophic world wars have killed off the best of our youth. Modern warfare demands elite troops and they are the ones that are killed. In Bomber Command, in the 2nd world war, 55,000 of Britains’s best young men died and our present leaders lack the quality we need.

Like all the empires before us the West has had enough of Empire and conquest, our youth looks for an alternative and like the idealists in the past looks for the perfect world.

Of all the isms of the twentieth century socialism laid claim to the future. Their mantra had a general appeal. It was, the West is evil, it uses too much of the world’s resources, it’s standard of living is too high, we pollute the earth and enslave the third world. We must atone for our evil past by giving our wealth away, share our countries and our wealth with a hoard of migrants eager to enjoy our riches. All men are equal but some men and women are more equal than others!

With the greatest Empire and the architect of the Industrial Revolution the basis of our civililsation: the English were considered the most evil by Britain’s liberal intelligentsia and socialism became the tool that would destroy us.

British intellectuals have always hated anything to do with machinery and despised wealth gained through manufacturing. In private schools the brightest pupils were streamed into the arts and then the city, lesser lights went into science and then the factories.

Socialists like the Jesuits before them realised that our schools were the secret to future poweer and through the teacher’s unions and academia fed socialist propaganda to the young.

In a Mail online article by Melanie Phillips, “Britain’s liberal intelligentsia has smashed virtually every social value, (www.dailymail.co.uk.riots) Melanie blames Britain’s liberal intelligentsia for the moral collapse that fuelled the U.K. riots.

“When Labour came to power in 1997, it set about systematically destroying not just the traditional family but the very idea that married parents were better for children than any other arrangement. Instead it introduced the sexual free-for-all lifestyle choice; claimed that the idea of a male breadwinner was a sexist anachronism and told girls that they could and should go it alone as mothers.”

Other policies promoted by the Labour government which was in the hands of the liberal Left and ultra-feminists were, non-judgmentalism , marginalisation of fathers, welfare dependency created by the entitlement culture, a tax system that penalises married couples with a wife who doesn’t work, teaching was deemed to be an attack upon a child’s autonomy and self-esteem and children had to learn by themselves and decide sexual morality and drug taking.

In Australia the equal out-comes policy ensured no pupil excelled unless they were Asian and work in factories was considered a betrayal of the green planet.

If you do not have a decent and secure job blame socialism. If you do not have a father blame the ultra-feminists and if you cannot read or write blame the teachers.

The success of their policy is that you still vote for them.

Britain has one advantage over Australia, Melanie Phillips could attack the system and one of the ultra-feminists Harriet Harman.

Nobody would dare attack the Union of Teachers in Australia our democracy is only skin deep.

Our industrial civilisation was a man’s world but it gave us our standard of living.

Our post-industrial society is a catastrophic failure that should be laid at the door of the Greens and socialists.

If we want a third world standard of living well and good but if you want all the advantages of modern civilisation get rid of these people.

The national current account shows the net amount a country is earning, in surplus or it’s deficit and Wikipedia list sovereign state as follows;

1. Peoples Republic of China, 272 billion

2. Japan 166 billion

3. Germany 162 billion

4. Russia 68 billion

5. Norway 60 billion

6. Netherlands 46 billion

183. Australia - 35 billion

185. Canada -40 billion

186. U.K. -40 billion

187. Brazil -52 billion

188. France -53 billion

189. Italy -61 billion

190. Spain -66 billion

191. United States -561 billion

END

This information was last modified 15.10.11. by Wilipedia

We had better manufacture or return to the Middle Ages.

Globalism and the E.U. under Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, may be forced to take a loan from China.

admin — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:17:43 +0000

Angela Merkel is now de facto head of the E.U. Germany has the biggest G.D.P. and the biggest export trade much of it with China. The problem is what will China demand in return for handing out billions in aid.

“The appeal to China underscored the precipitous decline in Europe’s economic strength and there were rising concerns last night China would demand far-reaching political and economic concessions in return for aid”. (1)

China wants an end to the E.U. arms export embargo which some E.U. members support, but the U.S. and Japan would object in the most vehement terms.

About 25% of China’s exports go to the E.U.

The problem is the E.U. has no policy to improve the economies of it’s members, some of whom have been critical of Germany”s industries on the grounds of enviromentsl issues.

In Italy for instance there is a mass movement of people from the South to the North and there is no work for young graduates who ar being forced to emigrate. (1)

Much of Europe, including Germany, is under the control of the enviromentalists which have made Europe a post industrial society where manufacturing is hated.

England is a classic case, she imports 70 billion pounds worth of goods more than she exports. Britain became the second largest exporter of services in the World in 1999 and in 2004 achieved an annual trade surplus of about 25 billion pounds in this field but this is not enough to make up for the loss of manufacturing.

The U.K. also runs a deficit in international travel and transportation.

The current account balance shows Britain’s economy is not paying it’s way and the reason is the large trade deficit in goods. (2)

The same goes for many other countries in Europe as well as Australia, Canada and the U.S.

China sells 25% of it’s exports to the E.U. if Europe and England returned to manufacturing China and Australia would suffer, but Europe would survive.

The West must cut out it’s aid to the third world, let China, India and the oil rich Middle East carry the burden.

Under green hegemony the West faces a third world standard of living, altruism must cease now. No more immigrants and no more aid, enough is enough.

If Europe and the English speaking world is to avoid third world status we must start manufacturing again and protect our industries from pirating by China.

Fair trade is not something China understands.

1. ‘What price China’s aid, EU asks itself’, The Weekend Australian, 29-30.10.11, p.10.

2. Macroeconomics – Balance of Payments, tutor2u*, http:tutor2u.net/economics/revision-notes/as-macro-balance-of-payments.html