The antics of the political parties in England and Australia are very similar,except that Australians are by nature more anti-authority than their English cousins.
That valuable tool of the English upper classes,political correctness,has made the English the slaves of the inner city elite,what better way to control a nation than by dictating the values by which they live. Mind control by the Christian churches,Islam and communism has served these autocrats well but the Bible,Koran or the writings of Karl Marx are not as subtle as the self serving “decency”of the British upper classes looking for a pliant lower class.
Human rights is obviously an invention of the British inner city elite who’s manipulation of the Banking system was one of the factors in the collapse of the World economy.
Who decided that Britain would be the first post-industrial society?,who decided that Britain would be a multi-racial society where migrants have more rights than the indigenous population?
Canada,another white colonial society,was the first country to decide that the white population had no right to Canada and that the country should fling open it’s doors to the millions of migrants from Africa and Asia.
England followed suit and now Australia is going down the same path.
In more and more countries the Courts,under the charter of Human Rights,replace the elected representatives of the people claiming that they are the arbiters of human rights and can override any law passed by the peoples parliament and never have to declare their political persuasion. Any society that is ruled by the courts is a tyranny,it’s parliamentary elections are a farce. It is not a Democracy,it is a legal tyranny maintained by a pliant police force.
Britain and the socialist nations complain when the army takes a hand in government but not when the state police maintains “Law and Order”,,Hitler’s High Court should have been tried and hung in Nuremberg.
The Australian unions believe that with Labor in power that they control the state. Fools,,the inner city elite will sell their shares in industry and resources to China and what happens,a Chinese-owned mining project in the Pilbara has retrenched 54 Australians ahead of Filipino migrants and those on 457 temporary visas. (The Australian 6-7- March 2010 p.8.)
The sacking would appear to confirm that Australian employers are not legally required to favour Australian workers over migrants,either when retrenching or hiring staff.
The immigration department said that there was no law requiring local workers to be employed first.
Another win for Human Rights. Our country called Australia is anybody’s country now. Unrestricted migration is the policy of socialism and so is one party rule. The trouble is that most so called right wing parties support for financial reasons the free movement of labour.
