The Archbishop of Canterbury,Rowan Williams,will not hold any line against the advance of Islam or gay and women priests. All peaceful resolutions result in major concessions made at the expense of the protestant churches. If the gays and lesbians want a church they should start their own church not take over ours. These people want to burn our bibles and write their own. Well and good but do not expect us to follow the new cult,the NGO’s and civil rights industry,that claims the priviledge of setting moral values.
In the Australian 16-17.2.08,p.12,the legal technicalities of Williams’comments,when he suggested Britain should adopt certain aspects of Sharia law,were discussed.
One comment written in The International Herald Tribune by Phillip Bland and Adrian Pabst argues that “Williams’legitimate religious concerns with freedom of conscience tie in with wider Western worries about the consequences of failing to integrate a growing,devout and alienated Islamic minority within a relativistic culture”. The writers say that Williams is repeating the errors of multi-culturalism of the 1960′s which entrenched segregation and fractures a concept pf common good binding all citizens.
The question the writers leave unanswered is why do you need religion if you resolve all issues with freedom of conscience and why should a secular society make any allowance for religion.
The increasingly Marxist governments of the E.U. need the support of Islam and the baby boomer generation could not care less,so the only question left is where the line against Islam will be drawn,at the borders of Eastern Europe or Russia? Americans do not care. As long as there is a buck in it for them all Europe could become Muslim. After all they gave Kosovo to Islam.
