The Planned Destruction of the Nordic (Northern European) People –Hereward2

These series of small essay swill deal with a theme seldom dealt with by so-called nationalist or freedom groups – the planned destruction of the Nordic race. The Nordic race or sub-racial group is depicted by Brunetto Chiarelli in Man Between Past and Future (Institute for the Study of Man,1995) as “extremely tall;thin body size;pinkish-white skin’ wavy and blond hair;blue eyes;long face;long thin nose with prominent and straight bone;thin lips;protruding chin”. (p. 47). By contrast he described the Mediterranean sub-racial group (Italians,Greeks etc) as follows:“Body size is rather small,with slender,frail structure;brownish skin;wavy brown or black hair;dark eyes;medium body hair but rich facial hair;long narrow head;narrow face with an oval outline’ medium size nose,with turned-down point and a straight nose-bone;flat cheek-bones;thicker lips than in other Europeans;well-developed chin”. (p 49). Brad Pitt is a Nordic and Danny DeVito a Mediterranean,by way of example.

The Disappearance of Blonds
A concern with the racial destruction of the Nordic people by a combination of immigration of the darker races,low birth rates (from feminism and “women’s liberation:ad race-mixing (miscegenation) before World War II was once a matter which could be written about by prominent people. For example,Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) was a two-term president of the United States was a Nordicist who saw Germans/Teutons and Celts as physically similar in every racial respect. He opposed coloured immigration to America,but not very successfully. (See S.W. Jamieson,Theodore Roosevelt on Race,Riots,Immigration and Crime,(Scott – Townsend Publishers,1996). During the early part of the 20th century writers such as Madison Grant (The Passing of the Great Race) and Lothrop Stoddard (The Riding Tide of Color;The Revolt Against Civilization) also warned about these dangers,but they could not have anticipated how truly pitiful the “end” of the great race would be.
Some,or indeed most political writers today in our traitorous universities portray the likes of Maddison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard as “racists” as if that word refutes them. But consider the Jewish figure Benjamin Disraeli who in his novel Coningsby (1844) described the Saxons as a pure race:“You come from the shores of the Northern Sea,land of the blue eye,and the golden hair,and the frank brow:‘tis a famous breed”. And in Tancred (1847) Disraeli said:“it is an affair of race. A Saxon race.. has stamped its diligent and methodic character on the century . And when a superior race,with a superior idea to work and order,advances its state will be progressive… All is race;there is no other truth”. (p. 157). Racisim – bah,humbug!

The Rising Tide of Color
The United Nations,a leading organ of the New World Order forecasts that at least 2.2 million migrant will arrive in the West every year. This is surely an underestimation. A recent issue of the US journal The Social Contract,for example,warned that the number of illegal migrants in the US is much more than the official estimated 14 million,and may be up to 30 million. In any case,the UN’s population division predicts “a global upheaval without parallel in human history over the next few decades:. The report continues “there will be billions more people in Africa,Asia and the Middle East. Of these,tens of millions will migrate to Europe and America,while the indigenous population of most countries (in the West) will either stagnate or decline”. This is a produce of a cosmopolitan multiracial ideology which believes in sharing technology and homelands. Christianity gave the White man the poisonous philosophy of cosmopolitanism and liberal capitalism built upon this racial slaughterhouse. In any case the world’s population will increase by 2.5 billion before dropping. This increase will be exclusively in Africa,Asia and the idle East.
D.A. Coleman of the University of Oxford in his paper to the Royal Society of London (“Replacement Migration,or Why Everyone is Going to Have to Live in Korea;A Fable of Or Times from the United Nations”,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Land on B,357,2000,pp 583-598)discusses this issue in detail:“Although immigration can prevent population decline,it is already well know that it can only prevent population ageing at unprecedented,unsustainable and increasing levels of inflow,which would generate rapid population growth and eventually displace the original population from its majority position:.
Frank Salter in his book On Genetic Interests,(Peter Lang,2003) argues that from an evolutionary perspective allowing replacement migration to occur is equivalent to foregoing having children,and is a sacrifice of an ethny’s (ethnic group’s) longer-term genetic interests.

Nordic Demographic Decline
In general 2.1 children per “woman” is considered to be the population replacement level. No Nordic people in any country on earth even comes close to this. Iceland is about the best at 1.99 while Germany is at 1.37. The uncomfortable political truth about this is that declining fertility is a product of modernization and the “liberation of women”. The greater women’s rights,freedoms and movement into the workplace,the less children they can have or want to have. Look at women shoppers at lunch-time,as they come from their jobs to shop. Examine the major department stores,with cosmetics sections at the very front of the store and you cannot but conclude that female consumerism is a major sector of the consumer society. Most of our women could have more children if the were less materialistic,greedy and selfish. Men too suffer from the same materialistic disease and some women would be prepared to more children,or even a child,can’t because a greedy husband wants his wife to be a wage slave. Feminism,women’s liberation,slobbish men and consumerist greed is a truly lethal combination.

The Bitter Fruits of Replacement Migration
The Danish People’s Party has a poster featuring a blonde Nordic girl with the caption” “When she retires,Muslims will be a majority in Denmark”. The archetypical home of Nordics,one populated by racially strong Vikings,Scandinavian countries Sweden,Denmark and Norway are becoming increasingly multiracial. Non-white majorities now populate whole districts of Stockholm,Gothenburg and Malmo. Somali immigrants,for example,have a birth rate three times greater than the birth rate of Swedes. At present 15 per cent of all children born in Sweden are non-white. Botkyrka has 35 per cent of its population non-European and has the highest violent crime rte of all Swedish countries. Relative to the 1960’s violent crime in Swede has rapidly increased:murder by 100 percent,rape 400 percent,robbery 1035 percent! (Source:http://www.amrent.com/0312issue/0312issue.htm)

Islam,Demography and Decline
One third of all European children are expected to be born to Muslim families by 2025. Germany could become a Muslim state by 2050,Holland even sooner. As a taste of things to come The Brussels Journal (www.bruseljournal,com) last year reported on municipal elections in the Netherlands with the headline “Muslim Vote Tips the Balance in Netherlands”. Muslim voters are already a power box and mainstream politicians are afraid to challenge this bloc:indeed most openly court it and do their best to discriminate against native white Europeans. In the Amsterdam borough of De Baarsjes,a white cross which served as a memorial to the Second World War had to be removed because it offended Muslims.

A Possible Solution:A Nordic Ethnostate in Russia

A property developer from Nottingham has bought 35,000 acres of arable land in Russia,in Penza,400 miles south-east of Moscow. The land was acquired at $100 an acre. This is one of the few places in the world where good land can be obtained cheaply. Thus,if a concentrated effort was made,even vaster tracks of land could be acquired. Russia is short of people and capital. President Putting has recognised this in speeches. Further,Russia has nuclear weapons so that any ethno state organically developing in its borders would be protected under its nuclear umbrella. The world “Russia” comes from “Rus”,meaning “red”. It was a country founded by the Vikings,at least with respect to its white component. It is one,if not the only,place left where people of our kind may retreat,to regroup and rebreed before reclaiming the world once more.
The alternative is to stay here in our existing execution cells and passively wait for the end.

1 comment to The Planned Destruction of the Nordic (Northern European) People –Hereward2

  • Anonymous

    I feel I need to respond to your essay on the decline in women having children.There are many reasons for the decline in population and not just due to women’s liberation. Weston and Parker explain the key reason for the fall in fertility is that first births are occurring later in life which means childbearing years are shortened. (http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/fm2002/fm63/rw.pdf) This is not simply a choice that women make on their own the ABS statistics find that we are not just marrying less we are also marrying later. “In 1986,the median age at first marriage for men was 25.6 years,increasing to 30.0 years in 2005.” (ABS,http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/0B6F42BBA4622404CA25732F001C93F1/$File/41020_Lifetime%20marriage%20and%20divorce%20trends_2007.pdf)Weston and Parker highlight other reasons including:Children leaving home later in life – marriage used to be main reason for leavingFragility of relationships – cohabitation dominant pathway to marriage,some evidence that cohabitation likely to end in a break up and this is as Qu and Weston state (Weston and Parker) this is an “important reason for women losing opportunities of having he children they once intended to have”.Parents without partners – with high rate of relationship breakdowns those single parents on their own may have intended to have more children but less likely to find a new partner and lowers opportunity of more children.Women’s growing financial independence – increased workforce participation and financial independence,able to stay in workforce after they marry.As a woman it is important for me to have independence and some opportunity to work as divorce rates are high. If my husband were to leave me for a younger woman I would need to work to support myself and my children.I am also one of the lucky few women who have a supporting partner who recognises that it is a very old and unrealistic perception that women should be chained to the kitchen sink popping out babies. My husband supports my decision to return to casual work and helps in raising our children,he cooks,cleans and nurtures. I must say he has an extremely good bond with our children who see him as a strong and supportive man who they are pleased to look up to. I think before you state that it is a woman’s choice you need to look at the whole of the change in society. Yes we need higher rates of children but we need to provide supportive measures to encourage this – more affordable quality child care,opportunities for evening and weekend work for women who want to contribute financially to the household and having adult time (it took me 6 months to find this job!!!),supportive husbands who realize that having children takes two and the hard part is actually raising them.

Leave a Reply