The MORALITY of SURVIVAL

(American Renaissance Vol. 6 No.8 Aug. 1995,PO Box 1674 Louisville Ky. 40201)

The Max Planck Society,Human Ethology,has shown in its article by Frank Salter,on Replacement Migration,that the white race is on the edge of oblivion.

In neo-Darwinian theory genes are the basic unit of selection and humans are “survival machines” evolved to perpetuate themselves in succeeding generations (Dawkins 1976). (A people constitute) a nation because they are conscious of being “members one of another” of being different from peoples of other lands. They are,and always have been,an inbreeding people. They have a particular affection for their native land and they would give their lives freely to preserve the integrity of the land and the liberty of its people. (Keith 1968/1943 pp.316-317)

An attempt is now being made to destroy our white nations and the white genes in us,by peoples in our society who see the success of our race as an affront to their belief that all men are created equal and therefore our very existence goes against the laws of nature.

The Declaration of Independence provides the best-known expression of “natural law” ever penned. (Masters). Writing about securing “unalienable Rights” endowed by “Nature and Nature’s God” Thomas Jefferson wrote:

“That to secure these rights,Governments are instituted among men,deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends,it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it.” The rights Jefferson identified, “Life,Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” were set forth by George Mason in the Virginia Declaration of Rights,ratified on May 8th 1776 and Mason’s work is the basis for Jefferson’s statement,but Mason’s version is superior because it eschews Jefferson’s’ poetic nonsense about men being created equal. Masons’ language still stands as a monument to Western political thought:(Masters Aug. 1995)

“All men are by nature equally free and independent,and have certain inherent rights,of which when they enter into a state of society,they cannot,by any compact,deprive or divest their posterity (future generations of people);namely,the enjoyment of life and Liberty,with the means of acquiring and possessing property,and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” (Mason)

Mason states the central thesis of natural law:People cannot,by any agreement,deprive their posterity of rights. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum on which rests the case that IMMIGRATION IS GENOCIDE.

The governments of the West have no right to impose present levels of immigration on their people NOR ARE WE MORALLY BOUND TO ACCEPT THEM.

William Blackstone wrote “self-defence is justly called the primary law of nature—It cannot be taken away by the laws of society. A good citizen must observe written laws as one of the highest duties but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity of self-preservation of saving our country when in danger,are the higher obligation.”

Their message is simple:Laws alone,independent of their survival utility,are not and cannot be,the underlying basis of civilizations. In the end,whoever makes and enforces the laws has the power to determine WHO LIVES AND WHO DIES. Survival is the ultimate principle upon which all enduring moral systems must based. (Masters)

If Europeans are marginalized and ultimately absorbed by the third world,the idealism of Western Liberals that permitted the third world invasion will have proved to be a lethal genetic flaw.

The success of the English speaking peoples in particular and the white race in general has been because of their quest for knowledge that was the basis of the Industrial Revolution and the desire for adventure which led to the acquiring of Empire. Unfortunately these traits generated fierce rivalry between states that ended in wars that have destroyed Europe.

England’s success was aided by a sense of loyalty and social responsibility that was understood to have existed between the various levels of society in previous centuries. This is now absent.

The creed of laissez-faire utilitarianism embodied in “Globalism” relieves the wealthy from any responsibility towards the poor who they despise for their lack of success.

The nation is split and the less successful can no longer rely on the elite to protect their interests

It is now every man and woman for themselves.

A speech by Pat Buchanan,a Presidential candidate,to the Boston World Affairs Council in Boston,Massachusetts titled’ Nationalism versus Globalism’ state the position in America (and this is also the position in Australia) he said:

“Christopher Lasch published THE REVOLT OF THE ELITES. It was a book about how America’s national elite was literally seceding from America. Pointing out the huge and growing gap in the income between the elite and the middle-class, LASCH argued that a more ominous gap existed in how each perceived America.

The old elite,LASCH wrote,had a sense of obligation to country and community. But the new ruling class,more merit based,brainy and mobile,congregates on the coasts and puts patriotism far down the list in hierarchy of values. Indeed Lasch says “It is a question of whether they think of themselves as American at all.””

Ralph Nader wrote to the executives of 100 giant U.S. corporations suggesting that they show their loyalty to “the country that bred them”,only one company responded favourably.

In the 1970’s Carl Gertslacher of DOW envisioned the day when Dow would be free of America. These big corporations want to rule the world. Their only loyalty is to their investors.

Early in the 1970’s Zbigniew Brezinski,later Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor,wrote:

A global consciousness is for the first time beginning to manifest itself—we are witnessing the emergence of transnational elites—composed of international businessmen,scholars,professional men,public officials.

The ties of these new elites cut across national boundaries:their perspectives are not confined to national traditions and their interests are more functional than national”

In Europe and England the elite are socialist and they would make the white race subservient to the Third World. BE WARNED whether whether you live in Europe,Australia or America you are in the hands of the enemy and the laws of survival apply.

Bibliography:

Dawkins,R. (1976). The Selfish Gene,Oxford:Oxford University Press

Keith,A. (1968/1947),a New Theory of Human Evolution,New York:Philosophical Library.

Masters,M. (Aug. 1975). We Are A People:The Morality of Survival:May/June Southern Patriot,American Renaissance.

2 comments to The MORALITY of SURVIVAL

  • Jim Bowery

    The Preamble to the US Constitution also stated the purpose for which the government was Constituted:”secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”There is no reasonable interpretation of the phrase “our Posterity”other than that the purpose of the US Government —the purpose of the US Constitution —the Intent of the Founders —was to ensure “the blessings of liberty”for the genetic descendants,or at the ethnic relatives,of those who fought for independence from Great Britain. It may be argued that this may have included some Africans who fought in the Revolutionary War but it cannot be argued that the Founders saw racial integration,in anything approaching the modern sense,as a primary value. Indeed,Jefferson explicitly decried both slavery and integration —declaring Africans and Europeans required different governments.

  • Anonymous

    “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”Good point. Not “ourselves”and “our”in that phrase. It doesn’t say “Liberty to all”nor “other nations’Posteriority”.Here is a link to an insightful article that begins with the above observation to conclude that foreign illegal border crossers (like smugglers) are not protected by the Bill of Rights:The Blessings of Liberty http://geocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/Blessings_of_the_Liberty.htm

Leave a Reply